Money Is Not Power Essay Topics

There aren’t a lot of shows on television today that have won more popular and critical acclaim than Netflix’s “House of Cards”. Available to all Netflix subscribers, the political drama focuses on the exploits of power-hungry congressman Frank Underwood as he cunningly manipulates his way to ever greater amounts of influence within the American political system. Frank is willing to do almost anything to increase his power, a fact that makes every episode quite enthralling.

The show’s second season was released in February of 2014, but today I want to examine a statement Frank made during the first season regarding a former subordinate, a man who once was a part of his congressional staff and had left public service for an extremely lucrative career as a lobbyist:

Such a waste of time, he chose money over power. In this town, a mistake nearly everyone makes. Money is the McMansion in Sarasota that starts falling apart after ten years. Power is the old stone building that stands for centuries. I can not respect someone that doesn’t see the difference.

Frank’s words here appear on the surface to work as a pretty strong indictment against the notion that money is in any way more significant or worthwhile than power. In my perusal of many discussions online relating to the show, I have seen Frank Underwood (along with quotes like the one above) used to substantiate claims that money really isn’t everything, that it is overrated and unsubstantial when compared to less tangible things like love or, in this case, power.

Are they correct, though? Does Frank Underwood’s story validate the notion of money over power? It would were it not for a simple truth:

Money Is Power

The choice Frank talks about is usually not nearly as stark as he made it out to be. Power often doesn’t come absent money, and this is a big reason why your typical congressman is quite well off. Your average US Senator is worth just under $3 million, and that’s just account for assets that they are required to disclose publicly. When you start talking about the more powerful, well known and influential members of congress (ex: Pelosi, Issa, Cantor, etc), you begin talking about much larger sums of money than that average.

Money is, more often than not, the main gateway to power: it is the wealthy that get a leg up in the race for elected positions or in the race for influential political appointments (e.g., the appointment of Hank Paulson as Sec. of Treasury, among other similar appointments). Political fundraisers are some of the most powerful people in this country. They use their money and the vast connections they’ve obtained to raise money for political candidates, who in turn often depend on them. Some have gone as far as to say that these people are basically puppet-masters, pulling strings in Congress and ruining the democratic process because their cash is giving them too much influence. This view is not entirely without merit—these people can often control the political narrative with the money they spend funding political campaigns and producing political advertisements, nevermind the business and investment interests they can leverage in their bid to encourage elected officials to do what they like.

Names like Warren Buffett, Koch (both brothers), Sheldon Anderson, and many others who are much less well known (Steyer, Singer, Schlosstein, Norcross, etc), are really some of the most powerful men in the USA, more so than all but a handful of men or women in Washington. These are people whose wealth and fundraising prowess give them control over much of the political narrative. They can almost totally lock down politics in their local stomping grounds (state or municipal elections and appointments, for example) and they can essentially buy influence in the federal legislature. Congressmen grovel to these people — there are hedge fund managers out there who have these men and women lining up outside of their offices just to get a word in edgewise.

In the developing world, the relationship between money and power is even more obvious thanks to lower transparency (more unchecked corruption, nepotism, etc), greater inequality, and other crucial factors. Consider the Philippines, one of the largest nations in South Asia, where political power is almost entirely held up by a handful of wealthy families.

Or consider Thailand, where the control wealthy political dynasties wield is even stronger. It’s bad enough that the Prime Minister’s seat in that nation has essentially been passed around in a single family for the better part of a decade now. Why have they been able to hold onto political power? They’re obscenely rich, that’s why.

I could go on, as these narratives play out in a lot of other developing countries where a cunning individual with just a few million dollars can essentially buy his way to the top.

For all of its outward promotion of the idea that power is more worthwhile than money, House of Cards actually does plenty to affirm the contrary view and does little to contradict any of what I wrote above.

Consider the following (possible mild spoilers here, you’ve been warned):

—Who is Frank’s most powerful rival in the show? Answer: Raymond Tusk. Why is Raymond Tusk so powerful? He’s got absurd amounts of money, which he has used to discreetly exert significant amounts of influence on the political process in Washington for decades.

—Who is the President of the United States in “House of Cards”? Garrett Walker. How did Garrett Walker become the President of the United States? He became bosom buddies with one of its richest men, Raymond Tusk, as the CEO of Tusk’s airline. This relationship made him rich as well, and got him a direct line to the White House.

—Who is a major foreign player in the second season of House of Cards? Xander Feng. Why is Xander Feng such a big factor? He’s a billionaire.

Remy Danton, the man that Frank derided in the quote I mentioned earlier in this article for choosing money over power, actually gained MORE power by moving on. He had more influence as a highly paid lobbyist than he did as one of Frank’s not-so-highly paid congressional henchmen. He didn’t have to sacrifice power at the altar of the almighty dollar—he got to have his cake and eat it too.

It is also worth noting that House of Cards, in its bid to give you good drama, doesn’t tell you the whole story about the influence money has in politics. To keep it simple, the show makes money seem like less of a game-changer than it actually is, and it is that creative license what allows Frank to directly lock horns with someone like Raymond Tusk and other really wealthy people (thus creating good television). In real life, big players like Tusk and Feng have a much easier time influencing US politics with their cash than the show let’s on, and their activities are FAR harder for the likes of Underwood and his henchmen to expose or counter.

And, of course, we cannot forget how Frank Underwood himself got started in politics to begin with: he married a VERY rich woman and rode her money to his first seat in congress. Money was Frank’s gateway to power.

At the end of the day, I think that the false dichotomy presented in House of Cards is a source of comfort for some. The idea that the accumulation of financial wealth and the acquisition of power don’t usually go hand in hand can serve to make those who are pessimistic about their ability to acquire large amounts of money more content with their lot in life. People feel more comfortable believing that the almighty dollar isn’t quite so almighty after all, and that their lack of money doesn’t put them at a tremendous disadvantage relative to the wealthy with regard to and the ability to make a difference in our society.

That’s a fine way to generate warm fuzzies, but digestion of the red pill necessitates the absorption of fundamental truths, and the truth here is this: money is power. Gifted fictional political titans like Frank Underwood can’t avoid that reality, and neither can you.

Read Next:The Ascent Of Money

  • Knowledge is easily assessible in the digital age, and it offers the bargaining power to attact money

    Public facilities support autodidacts e.g. library for books and computer access, so I think everyone gets equal opportunity to be great in this digital age. With the help of social media connections and self promotion, you can connect like minded people globally and collaborate. It is more important to figure out what you want and who you are in life, and money will follows.

  • We need knowledge to earn money.

    We need money for knowledge and knowledge for money.If we don't have knowledge how would we earn a good job for money? This is a big question.I say that both things matter knowledge and money.If we don't have money how will we pay the fees of our kids and ourselves.

  • Knowledge Matters More Than Money

    While money can be influential, I believe that knowledge matters more. If you had a million dollars and were not smart enough to invest it wisely or spend it wisely, you could end up in debt very quickly. Without knowledge - book smarts or street smarts (common sense) - money doesn't mean a whole lot.

  • Knowledge Matters More Than Money

    While money can be influential, I believe that knowledge matters more. If you had a million dollars and were not smart enough to invest it wisely or spend it wisely, you could end up in debt very quickly. Without knowledge - book smarts or street smarts (common sense) - money doesn't mean a whole lot.

  • Knowledge Under Poverty

    You might be a highly skilled worker from a poor family (engineer, doctor, etc.). IF you are able to achieve this, props. However, the invisible hand of the markets makes knowledge a commodity like anything else and in this day and age a poor wise man must sell his labor to the rich just to exist.

  • Knowledge lasts a lifetime, money can be taken or stolen

    Knowledge is far more important than money, if one has knowledge he/she can replenish it given opportunity. Nobody can take the knowledge you have gained besides death and fire ( burning of knowledge records). Anybody can take or steal money from you. With enough knowledge, one may amass great wealth, absent advantageous beginnings.

  • Knowledge is belong to soul whereas money is belong to elements:

    Hi,I'm sooraj i'm here to say that knowledge is greater than money because as humans we all must follow dharma in our life.Dharma means a human should think about all the problems faced by the universe as we all are made up of souls ,which is a part of 'paramathma' [god] and knowledge is a joy of soul which is indestructible whereas money is a joy of humans body which is made up of 5 elements they all gets separated to their own elements after dead so money can give a temporary joy an comfort but wisdom or knowledge gives a permanent comfort to soul and realise it that they are all a part of paramathma


  • Knowledge rule this days

    According to me it is the technology that rules the wold, so the knowledge is more important than the money. The money comes and go and knowledge remains with the person. He can utilise it in later life and earn money out of it. Therefore a person has to entrust his time toearn knowledge in his growing age rather than spending time on the earning of money. When the nation gives more importance to education it progress well otherwise it looses its progress and eventually the money and related positons.

  • Knowledge will always ahead from money

    Work will remain on the top because you would know everything ofrom money you couldn't stop natural calamities neither from knowledge too but from knowledge you will indulge least yourself in producing of monoxide, methane and cfc's carbon producing gases. Its is clearly mentioning here that from money you will do anything anytime but by knowledge the speed and rapidness by which your work will remain on top everything will be in your your tips and that comes from knowledge. And knowledge can not steal from you but money will get zero at some span of time. So think guys over it.

  • Solve the problem not wand money.

    Money may create a happy living and seems more important to us in our society but we should remember what really matters. Not only do we pass on what we know to the next and infinitely continues, but with knowledge, chances of survival increases. In a sense, happiness is survival since survival is a platform on earth. Money may temporarily satisfy but knowledge is a leading step to technology and money.

    How successful is knowledge today? Pretty successful especially when our nation is taking priority in education. As a matter of fact one reliant to fix nations debt is education.

  • One thought on “Money Is Not Power Essay Topics

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *